Batomon Showdown

Pairs tier list

Seen together is the share of observed ranked rounds that include both Batomon. The win rate divides their round wins by their decided rounds.

100 of 100 entries

S tier: Pairs10 entries

  • OnsetraShrinell
    65.2%1,672 wins in 2,563 observationsSeen together 2.2% (2,563 of 116,102 rounds)
  • DraconarchStalagrove
    52.1%1,036 wins in 1,988 observationsSeen together 1.7% (1,988 of 116,102 rounds)
  • AegistructDraconarch
    51.8%1,187 wins in 2,292 observationsSeen together 2.0% (2,292 of 116,102 rounds)
  • DracanaOnsetra
    50.8%1,221 wins in 2,405 observationsSeen together 2.1% (2,405 of 116,102 rounds)
  • DracanaDryadell
    49.7%1,088 wins in 2,188 observationsSeen together 1.9% (2,188 of 116,102 rounds)
  • GinsageNinflora
    48.1%1,233 wins in 2,561 observationsSeen together 2.2% (2,561 of 116,102 rounds)
  • AegistructStalagrove
    47.2%1,402 wins in 2,972 observationsSeen together 2.6% (2,972 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CraghornStalagrove
    46.8%931 wins in 1,990 observationsSeen together 1.7% (1,990 of 116,102 rounds)
  • BambudoDryadell
    46.6%880 wins in 1,889 observationsSeen together 1.6% (1,889 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CoalemDraconarch
    45.5%1,447 wins in 3,181 observationsSeen together 2.7% (3,181 of 116,102 rounds)

A tier: Pairs20 entries

  • AegistructCoalem
    43.9%1,265 wins in 2,882 observationsSeen together 2.5% (2,882 of 116,102 rounds)
  • FormiqueenOnsetra
    43.2%815 wins in 1,885 observationsSeen together 1.6% (1,885 of 116,102 rounds)
  • DracanaOpalion
    42.7%1,739 wins in 4,076 observationsSeen together 3.5% (4,076 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CoalemStalagrove
    42.5%1,005 wins in 2,365 observationsSeen together 2.0% (2,365 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CraghornBerroon
    41.9%1,200 wins in 2,866 observationsSeen together 2.5% (2,866 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CairnageOpalion
    41.8%1,242 wins in 2,971 observationsSeen together 2.6% (2,971 of 116,102 rounds)
  • StellagonVelocect
    41.7%755 wins in 1,811 observationsSeen together 1.6% (1,811 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CinnabarkMiasmaw
    41.5%2,005 wins in 4,830 observationsSeen together 4.2% (4,830 of 116,102 rounds)
  • DrumireMiasmaw
    40.7%1,608 wins in 3,953 observationsSeen together 3.4% (3,953 of 116,102 rounds)
  • DracanaGinsage
    40.0%747 wins in 1,868 observationsSeen together 1.6% (1,868 of 116,102 rounds)
  • BonshellCairnage
    39.6%797 wins in 2,012 observationsSeen together 1.7% (2,012 of 116,102 rounds)
  • BonshellOpalion
    39.5%2,207 wins in 5,590 observationsSeen together 4.8% (5,590 of 116,102 rounds)
  • BonshellDracana
    39.4%1,504 wins in 3,814 observationsSeen together 3.3% (3,814 of 116,102 rounds)
  • OpalionSaberhorn
    39.2%1,075 wins in 2,743 observationsSeen together 2.4% (2,743 of 116,102 rounds)
  • BumbleboltVelocect
    38.8%960 wins in 2,477 observationsSeen together 2.1% (2,477 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CicadenceGuardiant
    38.5%772 wins in 2,004 observationsSeen together 1.7% (2,004 of 116,102 rounds)
  • DollhimeRubbin
    38.4%807 wins in 2,100 observationsSeen together 1.8% (2,100 of 116,102 rounds)
  • AviarabGemwing
    38.3%731 wins in 1,911 observationsSeen together 1.6% (1,911 of 116,102 rounds)
  • BeetdownGinsage
    37.9%749 wins in 1,974 observationsSeen together 1.7% (1,974 of 116,102 rounds)
  • DracanaSaberhorn
    37.5%1,258 wins in 3,357 observationsSeen together 2.9% (3,357 of 116,102 rounds)

B tier: Pairs40 entries

  • NoxnimbusSpinarai
    37.4%920 wins in 2,460 observationsSeen together 2.1% (2,460 of 116,102 rounds)
  • PuffloonSpinarai
    37.3%1,417 wins in 3,794 observationsSeen together 3.3% (3,794 of 116,102 rounds)
  • BonshellSaberhorn
    37.0%960 wins in 2,593 observationsSeen together 2.2% (2,593 of 116,102 rounds)
  • MagmiteSunsage
    36.9%969 wins in 2,627 observationsSeen together 2.3% (2,627 of 116,102 rounds)
  • JoltailVelocect
    36.8%693 wins in 1,883 observationsSeen together 1.6% (1,883 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CobrexFumungus
    36.7%1,235 wins in 3,367 observationsSeen together 2.9% (3,367 of 116,102 rounds)
  • DrumireOnsetra
    36.6%962 wins in 2,627 observationsSeen together 2.3% (2,627 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CobrexPuffloon
    36.4%1,587 wins in 4,361 observationsSeen together 3.8% (4,361 of 116,102 rounds)
  • FurnadonOnsetra
    36.3%734 wins in 2,021 observationsSeen together 1.7% (2,021 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CinnabarkOnsetra
    35.9%1,273 wins in 3,547 observationsSeen together 3.1% (3,547 of 116,102 rounds)
  • OnsetraSteamscuttle
    35.8%819 wins in 2,285 observationsSeen together 2.0% (2,285 of 116,102 rounds)
  • FurnadonOuroblaze
    35.5%753 wins in 2,120 observationsSeen together 1.8% (2,120 of 116,102 rounds)
  • GemwingSproach
    35.3%821 wins in 2,325 observationsSeen together 2.0% (2,325 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CinnabarkScorubble
    35.3%725 wins in 2,055 observationsSeen together 1.8% (2,055 of 116,102 rounds)
  • FormiqueenVelocect
    34.7%1,101 wins in 3,177 observationsSeen together 2.7% (3,177 of 116,102 rounds)
  • AristobatCobrex
    34.5%962 wins in 2,787 observationsSeen together 2.4% (2,787 of 116,102 rounds)
  • BlixieSunsage
    34.3%883 wins in 2,573 observationsSeen together 2.2% (2,573 of 116,102 rounds)
  • DracanaDrumire
    34.2%643 wins in 1,880 observationsSeen together 1.6% (1,880 of 116,102 rounds)
  • MagmalithSunsage
    33.6%1,026 wins in 3,050 observationsSeen together 2.6% (3,050 of 116,102 rounds)
  • OuroblazeSteamscuttle
    33.5%1,228 wins in 3,668 observationsSeen together 3.2% (3,668 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CicadenceFormiqueen
    33.1%772 wins in 2,334 observationsSeen together 2.0% (2,334 of 116,102 rounds)
  • ElectranadeVelocect
    33.0%1,025 wins in 3,103 observationsSeen together 2.7% (3,103 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CobrexNoxnimbus
    33.0%764 wins in 2,316 observationsSeen together 2.0% (2,316 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CicadenceVelocect
    32.9%1,100 wins in 3,339 observationsSeen together 2.9% (3,339 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CherubbleVelocect
    32.9%744 wins in 2,259 observationsSeen together 1.9% (2,259 of 116,102 rounds)
  • DrumireVipair
    32.9%672 wins in 2,042 observationsSeen together 1.8% (2,042 of 116,102 rounds)
  • NoxnimbusPuffloon
    32.7%1,794 wins in 5,483 observationsSeen together 4.7% (5,483 of 116,102 rounds)
  • PylongVelocect
    32.6%742 wins in 2,274 observationsSeen together 2.0% (2,274 of 116,102 rounds)
  • FurnadonRubbin
    32.6%932 wins in 2,863 observationsSeen together 2.5% (2,863 of 116,102 rounds)
  • DrumireOpalion
    32.5%1,147 wins in 3,533 observationsSeen together 3.0% (3,533 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CinnabarkVipair
    32.1%1,015 wins in 3,164 observationsSeen together 2.7% (3,164 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CinnabarkDracana
    31.9%695 wins in 2,178 observationsSeen together 1.9% (2,178 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CinnabarkDrumire
    31.8%2,866 wins in 9,013 observationsSeen together 7.8% (9,013 of 116,102 rounds)
  • FumungusPuffloon
    31.6%1,626 wins in 5,138 observationsSeen together 4.4% (5,138 of 116,102 rounds)
  • IroncoreVelocect
    31.6%642 wins in 2,031 observationsSeen together 1.7% (2,031 of 116,102 rounds)
  • BonshellNinflora
    31.3%567 wins in 1,812 observationsSeen together 1.6% (1,812 of 116,102 rounds)
  • AsterPlunderbird
    31.2%634 wins in 2,035 observationsSeen together 1.8% (2,035 of 116,102 rounds)
  • NekoffinPetrirex
    31.0%666 wins in 2,151 observationsSeen together 1.9% (2,151 of 116,102 rounds)
  • NekoffinShikitsune
    30.6%681 wins in 2,222 observationsSeen together 1.9% (2,222 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CherubbleElectranade
    30.5%699 wins in 2,290 observationsSeen together 2.0% (2,290 of 116,102 rounds)

C tier: Pairs20 entries

  • CinnabarkOpalion
    30.4%1,319 wins in 4,342 observationsSeen together 3.7% (4,342 of 116,102 rounds)
  • HumboltIroncore
    30.2%632 wins in 2,094 observationsSeen together 1.8% (2,094 of 116,102 rounds)
  • AristobatPuffloon
    30.1%1,489 wins in 4,942 observationsSeen together 4.3% (4,942 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CoalemSunsage
    30.0%910 wins in 3,030 observationsSeen together 2.6% (3,030 of 116,102 rounds)
  • PuffloonThorntail
    29.8%890 wins in 2,983 observationsSeen together 2.6% (2,983 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CawnushiPetrirex
    29.7%537 wins in 1,806 observationsSeen together 1.6% (1,806 of 116,102 rounds)
  • LumijelSnapscald
    29.6%658 wins in 2,220 observationsSeen together 1.9% (2,220 of 116,102 rounds)
  • AristobatFumungus
    29.5%956 wins in 3,238 observationsSeen together 2.8% (3,238 of 116,102 rounds)
  • DewlotlSwoonet
    29.4%743 wins in 2,523 observationsSeen together 2.2% (2,523 of 116,102 rounds)
  • FumungusNoxnimbus
    29.4%946 wins in 3,215 observationsSeen together 2.8% (3,215 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CawnushiShikitsune
    29.3%558 wins in 1,903 observationsSeen together 1.6% (1,903 of 116,102 rounds)
  • FurnadonSteamscuttle
    29.2%1,224 wins in 4,189 observationsSeen together 3.6% (4,189 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CinnabarkCordycant
    29.0%784 wins in 2,700 observationsSeen together 2.3% (2,700 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CinnabarkGemwing
    29.0%574 wins in 1,980 observationsSeen together 1.7% (1,980 of 116,102 rounds)
  • BonshellGinsage
    28.7%735 wins in 2,564 observationsSeen together 2.2% (2,564 of 116,102 rounds)
  • DewlotlSteamscuttle
    28.6%657 wins in 2,297 observationsSeen together 2.0% (2,297 of 116,102 rounds)
  • AristobatNoxnimbus
    28.3%858 wins in 3,029 observationsSeen together 2.6% (3,029 of 116,102 rounds)
  • AristobatThorntail
    28.1%519 wins in 1,850 observationsSeen together 1.6% (1,850 of 116,102 rounds)
  • LumijelSwoonet
    27.9%758 wins in 2,721 observationsSeen together 2.3% (2,721 of 116,102 rounds)
  • BonshellRhizuka
    27.7%495 wins in 1,784 observationsSeen together 1.5% (1,784 of 116,102 rounds)

D tier: Pairs10 entries

  • OpalionRhizuka
    27.7%611 wins in 2,207 observationsSeen together 1.9% (2,207 of 116,102 rounds)
  • CinnabarkShogapede
    27.5%510 wins in 1,854 observationsSeen together 1.6% (1,854 of 116,102 rounds)
  • SnapscaldSwoonet
    27.5%991 wins in 3,609 observationsSeen together 3.1% (3,609 of 116,102 rounds)
  • SteamscuttleSwoonet
    27.3%1,160 wins in 4,243 observationsSeen together 3.7% (4,243 of 116,102 rounds)
  • LumijelSteamscuttle
    27.3%618 wins in 2,266 observationsSeen together 2.0% (2,266 of 116,102 rounds)
  • SnapscaldSteamscuttle
    27.3%1,232 wins in 4,518 observationsSeen together 3.9% (4,518 of 116,102 rounds)
  • PetrirexShikitsune
    26.9%1,240 wins in 4,609 observationsSeen together 4.0% (4,609 of 116,102 rounds)
  • PyrokamiSteamscuttle
    23.1%752 wins in 3,250 observationsSeen together 2.8% (3,250 of 116,102 rounds)
  • RatacombShikitsune
    20.6%451 wins in 2,191 observationsSeen together 1.9% (2,191 of 116,102 rounds)
  • PetrirexRatacomb
    19.0%339 wins in 1,785 observationsSeen together 1.5% (1,785 of 116,102 rounds)
Tier method and observation details

Tiers rank raw observed win percentages within each category, not across categories. S: top 10%; A: next 20%; B: middle 40%; C: next 20%; D: bottom 10%.

Entries need at least 100 decided observations. A category needs at least 5 eligible entries. Other entries stay unranked.

An observation is a decided round record (a win or a loss) with the entity or pair. Trainer observations count public runs with a reported win or loss. The same run can contribute more than one observation.

Public profiles do not cover every player. Rarity, round, lineup, player skill, and selection can affect observed rates. The win percentage describes these matches, not a prediction or a causal effect.

The pair list contains at most 100 pairs. Private Companion matches are not part of this sample. Understand the denominator and sample limits.